From
the viewpoint of the respondent, the response to each item is influenced
by the items before and after it. There are two general considerations
for shaping the order of questionnaire items.
A)
Begin the questionnaire with items that are easy, appropriate
for all respondents, and central to the main topic; put sensitive
items at the end. The respondent's reaction to the first few
items usually determines whether he or she will try to complete
the questionnaire. It is important to begin with one or more items
that all respondents can answer. Thus, if you are asking teachers
about their instructional resources, you wouldn't start with questions
about computers because only some teachers may use computers.
In addition, the questions should be easy in the sense that respondents
should not have to obtain a lot of information to generate answers.
The
initial questions should pique the respondents' interest and engage
them with the questionnaire. Begin with items asking for opinions
on matters likely to be of interest to them. For example, if you
are interested in teachers' instructional resources, you might
ask first how satisfied they are with the instructional resources
available at their school, since they are likely to have strong
feelings about the matter and will welcome the opportunity to
express their opinions. For the same reason, do not start the
questionnaire with items about background characteristics (e.g.,
number of years teaching), because such questions, although easy,
will not engage them much. Save them for later in the questionnaire.
After
items most central to the topic are presented, subgroupings of
items more narrowly focused or less central to the topic should
follow. If the questionnaire includes questions to which respondents
may be especially sensitive, such as salary information, they
should appear near the end because respondents are less likely
to quit when nearly finished.
B)
Group items into logical subtopics while maintaining interest.
Deciding how to order all of the items for a questionnaire requires
balancing several concerns. On the one hand, respondents typically
give more meaningful answers if questions flow in a logical order,
with items on a given subtopic grouped together. On the other
hand, if there are too many items in a row about one subtopic,
respondents may lose focus and motivation.
Therefore,
one needs to find a middle ground between asking questions in
a completely random order (likely to frustrate respondents) and
asking too many narrowly focused questions in sequence (likely
to make them lose interest). If one ends up with too many items
in a subtopic, one solution is to try to reduce redundancies by
crafting more inclusive wordings or eliminating less productive
items. Also, if items in a subgroup share the same response categories,
an items-in-a-series format is efficient (see Figure 1).
Figure 1. An example of an items-in-a-series format.
If many (say 10 or more) similarly focused items are unavoidable,
then it's worth experimenting with breaking these items up into
smaller groupings. Pilot-testing the questionnaire (see
Step 5)
with alternative groupings of items should provide useful guidance.