home
  : Reports : Under-Represented Populations





























home reports instruments plans
search

Under-Represented Populations Stand-Alone Report 1 (Progress)

 Return to Under-Represented Populations Reports

1995 Program Evaluation of the Women in Science Project at Dartmouth College

This evaluation progress report was prepared by Christine M. Cunningham, Ph.D. and submitted to the National Science Foundation under Grant Number #HRD 9353764 in November of 1995.

Table of Contents:

WISP Evaluation

  1. Executive Summary
    1. Principal Findings
    • Executive Summary
  2. Recommendations
    1. Recommendations Aligned with the Existing WISP Structure
    • Results & Recommendations: Interpretations & Conclusions, Recommendations
    2. New Dimensions for WISP
    • Results & Recommendations: Interpretations & Conclusions, Recommendations
  3. Findings
    1. Quantitative Data Analysis
    • Analysis Process: Quantitative Analysis
    2. Qualitative Data Analysis
    1. WISP Internship
      • Evaluation Overview: Evaluation Purposes
      • Design: Instruments, Data Collection Procedures & Schedule
      • Analysis Process: Qualitative Analysis
    2. WISP Programming
      • Analysis Process: Quantitative Analysis
      • Results & Recommendations: Interpretations & Conclusions
    3. Women Who Major in Science
      • Design: Information Sources & Sampling
      • Analysis Process: Quantitative Analysis
      • Results & Recommendations: Interpretations & Conclusions
    4. Women Considering a Major in Science
      • Analysis Process: Quantitative Analysis
      • Results & Recommendations: Interpretations & Conclusions
    5. Women Who "Leave" Science
      • Analysis Process: Quantitative Analysis
      • Results & Recommendations: Interpretations & Conclusions

WISP Appendices

  1. Design of Evaluation
    • Design: Methodological Approach, Information Sources & Sampling, Instruments, Data Collection Procedures & Schedule
  2. Statistical Analysis
    • Analysis Process: Quantitative Analysis
  3. Journal Questions
    • Design: Instruments
  4. Questionnaires
    • Design: Instruments
  5. Interview Protocol for Semi-structured Junior Interviews
    • Design: Instruments

From the author: I would like to thank Dartmouth College Records for providing the data used for the quantitative analysis, Dr. William Carlsen for designing and conducting the quantitative analysis, Valery Hussain for her help editing and coding data, Cecile Ferguson for her administrative support, and Mary Pavone for her insights and suggestions.