home
  : Reports : Faculty Development





























home reports instruments plans
search

Faculty Development Annotated Report Excerpts

Return to Faculty Development Reports

Results & Recommendations

The table below contains report excerpts (right column) accompanied by annotations (left column) identifying how the excerpts represent the Results & Recommendations Criteria.

Executive Summary | Project Description | Evaluation Overview
Design | Analysis Process | Results & Recommendations

Annotations Report Excerpts
 

Excerpt 1 [Great Lakes Research Consortium]

Interpretations & Conclusions:
Presents and interprets quantitative and qualitative results

After a year of developing or revising curricula, nine participants met at Brockport, NY in August 1997 to report on their practicum-related curriculum development activities during the 1996-97 academic year. The reports assembled in this document illustrate the high level of commitment by the participants to the GLRC/NSF practicum. Of the 16 participants, 15 who were active in 1996-97 created or revised curricula, including 5 (33%) who developed new courses based on practicum experiences. Nine of 15 (60%) developed new environmental impact statements (EIS) modules for one or more courses, including using a real local issue (40%), extensive cooperative learning activities (53%), and role playing exercises (27%). Six (40%) of the 15 active participants created new laboratory or modeling exercises that required students to use spreadsheets (mostly on Excel donated to practicum participants by Microsoft Corp.), and four participants (27%) went on to use ELISA test kits for PCTs or pesticides in their lab/field courses. Three of the participants (20%) are creating new majors, minors, concentrations or M.S. programs that include one or more aspects of GLRC/NSF practicum activities in their new curricula. Four of the participants (27%) wrote and submitted grant proposals to obtain further support for their curricular innovations, and two have been funded. This last outcome was the result of a half-day discussion of grant opportunities on the last day of the practicum led by a 1994 GLRC/NSF summer practicum participant who had experience writing, receiving, and reviewing curriculum development proposals for NSF. Her insights on how to write successful proposals greatly stimulated the other participants and led to external support for curricular development at two of the participants' institutions. In sum, all but one of the participants used GLRC practicum information and materials to create new curricula based on their practicum experiences.

 

Excerpt 2 [University of Florida]

Interpretations & Conclusions:
Presents program strengths and weaknesses

Comments for week one were favorable. Suggestions for improvement included the observation that the workshop relied on considerable knowledge of chemistry even though the participants came from a variety of backgrounds. Some responses indicated that some lectures could have benefited from more structure. Two responses mentioned that the equipment for some activities was not available at public schools. The comments for week two were very supportive and suggested that the program be expanded in both time and the number of participants.