home
  : Instruments : Under-Represented Populations





























home reports instruments plans
search

Under-Represented Populations Instruments

Return to Instrument Table

Student Project Evaluations

Instrument 3: Summative Survey

Project: Career Access for Women in Engineering: Moving Toward a Comprehensive National Effort
Purdue University

Funding Source: NSF: Presidential Awards for Excellence in Science, Mathematics, & Engineering Mentoring (HRD)

Purpose: To gather summative data from women who participated in the Purdue Women in Engineering Programs Graduate M&M Mentoring Program

Administered To: Female students who participated in the program as part of a mentoring group

Topics Covered:

  • Impact on Outcomes: confidence
  • Mentoring & Support: activities, support
  • Project Evaluation: areas for program improvement, content, objectives, organization, practical value, satisfaction

Format/Length: 16 questions, 11 closed- and 5 open-ended


SUMMATIVE SURVEY

Purdue University Women in Engineering Program
Graduate M&M Mentoring Program
Survey Due: May 1, 1998

Please circle only one number as you answer each survey question.

    strongly
disagree
              strongly
agree
1. My experience in the Mentoring Program has positively affected the amount of personal support that I have received at Purdue.
Please explain________________________________
1   2   3   4   5
2. My experience in the Mentoring Program has positively affected my self-esteem.
Please explain________________________________
1   2   3   4   5
3. My experience in the Mentoring Program has given me effective strategies for reaching my career goals.
Please explain________________________________
1   2   3   4   5
4. The goals of the Mentoring Program are to provide support, increase self-esteem, and share strategies to help you become successful. I believe there was a relationship between these program goals and the topics covered at monthly meetings. 1   2   3   4   5
5. I felt the topics were beneficial. 1   2   3   4   5
6. I think the meeting time of two hours was well used. 1   2   3   4   5
7. I was not restricted from attending the meetings because of the time they were held. 1   2   3   4   5
8. I put a lot of effort into the Mentoring Program. 1   2   3   4   5
9. Overall, the Mentoring Program was a worthwhile experience for me. 1   2   3   4   5

  1. Please indicate the type of contacts during each semester you had with your mentoring group (mark all that apply)

    1st Semester 2nd Semester
    _____phone calls _____phone calls
    _____one-to-one meetings _____one-to-one meetings
    _____E-mail contact _____E-mail contact
    _____group activities _____group activities
    _____other (please specify) _____________________ _____other (please specify) _____________________

Additional Comments:  ______________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________

Suggestions for future program topics and/or speakers:
_________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________

Please fold and secure this document so that the Women in Engineering Programs address appears on the outside and place it in campus mail.

Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey!
Please return completed survey by May 1, 1997.