home
  : Instruments : Teacher Education





























home reports instruments plans
search

Teacher Education Instruments

Return to Instrument Table

Teacher/Faculty Workshop Evaluations

Instrument 5: IAP-PA Economics Institute Evaluation Form

Project: Advanced High School Economics Institute
University of Scranton

Funding Source: NSF: Teacher Enhancement (ESIE)

Purpose: To determine the attitude of teacher participants toward their experience during the first summer of a 2-year summer institute in economics. Each participant's satisfaction with the institute, content covered, materials, instructors, and value for improving instruction is assessed.

Administered To: The survey was completed by 20 secondary teachers who were participants in an institute designed to improve their economic understanding and skill in teaching college-level principles of mathematics to high school students. 16 of the teachers had completed both the 1995 and 1996 institute and 4 teachers had completed just the 1996 institute.

Topics Covered:

  • Workshop Evaluation: areas for program improvement, assessment, content, effectiveness, endorsement, exemplary areas, instructor, materials, methods, organization

Format/Length: 49 questions total, 47 closed- and 2 open-ended. The closed-ended items are 5-point Likert scales that range from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." Some closed-ended items have room for comments. The open-ended items ask participants to identify basic strengths and limitations of the institute. Participants are asked to provide a brief written response to the open-ended questions.


IAP-PA ECONOMICS INSTITUTE
July 8 - August 1, 1996

Directions:

You have completed the AP-NSF Economic Institute.
Please reflect on your institute experience and complete this evaluation form.

Circle your response to the following statements using this scale:

SA = STRONGLY AGREE
A = AGREE
UN = UNCERTAIN
D = DISAGREE
SD = STRONGLY DISAGREE
NA = NOT APPLICABLE

1. The institute was well organized. SA A U D SD NA
Comments:              
               
2. The institute improved my knowledge and understanding of economics. SA A U D SD NA
Comments:              
               
3. The Institute gave me good preparation for teaching an AP macroeconomics course. SA A U D SD NA
Comments:              
               
4. The Institute gave me good ideas and/or materials for teaching about economics in the class I teach. SA A U D SD NA
Comments:              
               
5. Overall, I would give this Institute a good rating. SA A U D SD NA
Comments:              
               

6.  Please evaluate each content area in the list below using the following statement. The (insert a-w) content presented in the Institute was very valuable for my education and for preparing me to teach AP macroeconomics.

 

Basic Economic Concepts
a. Scarcity: the nature of economics systems SA A U D SD NA
               
b. Opportunity costs and production possibilities SA A U D SD NA
               
c. Specialization and comparative advantage SA A U D SD NA
               
d. The functions of economic systems (what, how, for whom) SA A U D SD NA
               
e. Demand, supply, price determination SA A U D SD NA
               

Measurement of Economic Performance

f. GDP, and national income concepts SA A U D SD NA
               
g. Inflation and price indices SA A U D SD NA
               
h. Unemployment SA A U D SD NA
               
i. Aggregate supply (Classical and Keynesian views) SA A U D SD NA
               
j. Components of aggregate demand SA A U D SD NA
               
k. Multiplier SA A U D SD NA
               
l. Fiscal policy SA A U D SD NA
               
m. Definition of money and its creation SA A U D SD NA
               
n. Tools of central bank policy SA A U D SD NA
               
o. Monetary policy and aggregate demand SA A U D SD NA
               
p. Interaction of fiscal and monetary policies SA A U D SD NA
               
q. Monetarist-Keynesian controversy SA A U D SD NA
               
r. Deficits SA A U D SD NA
               
s. Trade-offs between inflation and unemployment SA A U D SD NA
               

International Economics and Growth

t. Balance of payments SA A U D SD NA
               
u. International finance SA A U D SD NA
               
v. Exchange rates SA A U D SD NA
               
w. Economic growth SA A U D SD NA
               
Comments:              

7.  Please evaluate each pedagogical topic in the list below using the following statement. The (insert a-g) content for the Institute was very valuable for my education.

a. AP course organization SA A U D SD NA
               
b. AP course content SA A U D SD NA
               
c. Classroom teaching tips SA A U D SD NA
               
d. Active learning strategies SA A U D SD NA
               
e. Games and simulations SA A U D SD NA
               
f. Testing exercises SA A U D SD NA
               
g. Written assignments and problems SA A U D SD NA
               
Comments:              

8.  Please evaluate each course material topic in the list below using the following statement. The (insert a-c) content for the Institute was very valuable for my education.

a. Advanced Placement Economics package (APE) SA A U D SD NA
               
b. Teacher's Guide to AP Courses in Micro/Macroeconomics SA A U D SD NA
               
c. Other materials (list) __________________ SA A U D SD NA
               
Comments:              

9.  Please evaluate each instructor in the list below using the following statement: (insert a-d) was a good instructor for the material taught or discussed.
a. Instructor A SA A U D SD NA
               
b. Instructor B SA A U D SD NA
               
d. Instructor C SA A U D SD NA
               
c. Instructor D SA A U D SD NA
               
Comments:              

10.  The Institute Director has done a good job of:
a. Communicating of Institute objectives and expectations SA A U D SD NA
               
b. Keeping me informed about Institute plans SA A U D SD NA
               
c. Distributing Institute materials SA A U D SD NA
               
d. Recognizing needs of AP-PA participants SA A U D SD NA
               
Comments:              

 

 

 

11. I would recommended this Institute to other teachers interested in AP Economics SA A U D SD NA

12.  The basic strengths of the Institute are:

 

 

 

13.  The basic limitations of the Institute are: