home
  : Instruments : Teacher Education





























home reports instruments plans
search

Teacher Education Instruments

Return to Instrument Table

Teacher/Faculty Interviews

Instrument 6: Suggestions Leading to Action Interviews

Project: Certification and Qualification Program for Underprepared Secondary Chemistry Teachers
University of Wisconsin, LaCrosse

Funding Source: NSF: Teacher Enhancement (ESIE)

Purpose: To assess the impact of a certification and qualification program for chemistry teachers

Administered To: Secondary chemistry teachers who participated in a 4-year masters program specifically tailored to high school teachers in the state of Wisconsin. The focus group meetings were conducted at a midwestern university in the spring.

Topics Covered:

  • Attitudes & Beliefs (Teacher/Faculty): students
  • Impact on Outcomes: confidence, instructional methods, integration, professional involvement, teacher attitudes, usage patterns
  • Institutional Context: administration
  • Project Evaluation: areas for program improvement, content, practical value
  • Self-Assessment (Teacher/Faculty): collaborative activities, implementation activities

Format/Length: 21 open-ended questions total among 4 interviews, distributed as follows: Professional Attitudes and Beliefs has 5 questions; Content Knowledge has 3; Pedagogy and Practices has 8; and Leadership has 5 questions. Some of the interview questions include prompts to aid respondents.


OUR FOCUS: SUGGESTIONS LEADING TO ACTION
Session a

Re: GRO #1 (Professional Attitudes & eliefs)

1.  a.  How did the constructivist model of learning have any impact on your professional beliefs?

{Prompt: For example, the constructivist model requires the teacher to shift his or her self-perspective from someone who "teaches" to someone who tries to facilitate learning.

--shift from teacher-focus to student focus. - teacher to facilitator}

  b.    In your opinion, why did constructivism have no impact?

2.  a.  How did NSF/CHEM affect your confidence in teaching chemistry? What are some specific examples?

{Prompt: For example, how has your approach to teaching been affected?}

  b.  How did NSF/CHEM affect your confidence in teaching courses other than chemistry? What are some specific examples?

{Prompt: For example, how has your approach to teaching been affected?}

3.  How has NSF/CHEM affected your professional practice?

 


 

OUR FOCUS: SUGGESTIONS LEADING TO ACTION
Session b

Re: GRO #2 (Content Knowledge)

1.  You are all teaching one chemistry course. How has the content knowledge gained in NSF/CHEM affected your teaching? Please give specific examples.

{Prompt: For example, topics added or a different slant taken.}

2.  What specific courses or content presented in NSF/CHEM have proven to be of no benefit?

3.  What specific chemistry courses or content improvements would you recommend for a future NSF/CHEM program?

 


 


OUR FOCUS: SUGGESTIONS LEADING TO ACTION
Session c

Re: GRO #3 (Pedagogy Knowledge & ractices)

1.  How has your teaching approach changed as a result of NSF/CHEM?

2.  Many of you teach other courses. How has your participation in NSF/CHEM affected your teaching in these non-chemistry courses?

3.  How has NSF/CHEM affected the way you use classroom resources?

4.  As a result of this training, have you implemented, or tried to implement, an integrated curriculum?

5.  a.  How has NSF/CHEM influenced your use of technology in your chemistry classrooms?

{Prompt: Why or Why Not?}

  b.  How have you used CBL in your chemistry courses?

{Prompt: Why or Why Not?}

6.  From the students' perspective, how have they benefited from your participation in NSF/CHEM?

7.  How has NSF/CHEM affected your beliefs about how students learn?

 


 

OUR FOCUS: SUGGESTIONS LEADING TO ACTION
Session d

Re: GRO #4 (Leadership)

1.  How would you define "leadership" as applied to the classroom teacher?

2.  What are your thoughts concerning the leadership role or focus associated with being a classroom teacher?

3.  How has your relationship, or influence with the school administration been affected by your participation in NSF/CHEM?

{Prompt: Please consider those with roles in curriculum design and coordination,
-- your division chairs, -- the front office}

4.  How have you shared ideas/approaches/philosophy coming from your participation in NSF/CHEM with other teachers?

5.  How do you keep in contact with other NSF/CHEM teachers? If you are in contact, what ideas do you think it is important to share?