home
  : Instruments : Curriculum Development





























home reports instruments plans
search

Curriculum Development Instruments

Return to Instrument Table

Student Attitude Surveys

Instrument 9: ChemLab Course Evaluation

Project: Contemporary Methods of Synthesis and Analysis in Undergraduate Chemistry
University of Louisville

Funding Source: NSF - Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE)

Purpose: Evaluate undergraduate chemistry lab course

Administered To: Undergraduate students who take a Chemistry Lab

Topics Covered:

  • Course Evaluation: organization, satisfaction, effectiveness, expectations, opportunity to learn, opportunity to practice, methods, materials, instructor, delivery, content, technology use, student/teacher interaction
  • Facilities: laboratory, access to technology
  • Implementation Characteristics: knowledge base of presenter/instructor
  • Instructional Practices
  • Limitations and Barriers: classroom resources
  • Perceptions (Student): teacher characteristics, teacher performance
  • Self Assessment (Student): performance

Format/Length: 27 closed-ended questions, of which 25 are scaled, 1 is yes/no, and 1 is multiple choice


FORM—CHEM LAB

University of Louisville - Course Evaluation
College of Arts and Sciences

INSTRUCTIONS:

  1. Please do not write on this question sheet.
  2. Use a #2 pencil ONLY to answer the questions on the computer form provided.
  3. Write the following on the top right of the answer sheet above the box "General Purpose - NCS - Answer Sheet".
    1. Instructor's name
    2. Course number 0316-course number-section

QUESTIONS:

  1. Is this a required course for your program?     1) yes     2) no
  2. What grade do you expect in this course?     1) A/Pass     2) B     3) C     4) D     5) F/Fail
For the questions below: 1 = Strongly disagree (SD)
  2 = Disagree (D)
  3 = Undecided (U)
  4 = Agree (A)
  5 = Strongly Agree (SA)


     
SD 
 D 
 U 
 A 
SA 
3. 
  My instructor displays a clear understanding of course topics.
1
2
3
4
5
4. 
  My instructor seems well-prepared for class.
1
2
3
4
5
5. 
  My instructor stimulates interest in the course.
1
2
3
4
5
6. 
  My instructor is actively helpful when students have problems.
1
2
3
4
5
7. 
  My instructor is readily available for consultation.
1
2
3
4
5
8. 
  When I have a question or comment I know it will be respected.
1
2
3
4
5
9. 
  The relationship of the course to my education is apparent.
1
2
3
4
5
10. 
  Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.
1
2
3
4
5
11. 
  Lab procedures are clearly explained to me.
1
2
3
4
5
12. 
  Instructor thoroughly understands lab experiments/equipment.
1
2
3
4
5
13. 
  Assistance is always available throughout lab sessions.
1
2
3
4
5
14. 
  The lab sessions are well-organized.
1
2
3
4
5
15. 
  The content of the lab is a worthwhile part of this course.
1
2
3
4
5
16. 
  Lab assignments are reasonable in length and complexity.
1
2
3
4
5
17. 
  Lab assignments have instructional value.
1
2
3
4
5
18. 
  The lab in this course has adequate facilities.
1
2
3
4
5
19. 
  My lab assignments are promptly returned to me.
1
2
3
4
5
20. 
  The size of this class is appropriate to course objectives.
1
2
3
4
5
21. 
  I have easy access to equipment/tools required in this course.
1
2
3
4
5
22. 
  I highly recommend this course.
1
2
3
4
5
23. 
  My instructor motivates me to do my best work.
1
2
3
4
5
24. 
  My instructor explains difficult material clearly.
1
2
3
4
5
25. 
  Course assignments are interesting and stimulating.
1
2
3
4
5
26. 
  Overall, this course 'is among the best I have ever taken.
1
2
3
4
5
27. 
  Overall, this instructor is among the best teachers I have known.
1
2
3
4
5