home
  : Reports : Faculty Development





























home reports instruments plans
search

Faculty Development Stand-Alone Report 1 (Progress)

Return to Faculty Development Reports

Dickinson Summer Seminars on Teaching Physics Using Interactive Teaching Methods on Computers

Return to Table of Contents

Previous Page


II. Overview of the ITMC Survey Population

A total of 235 college instructors and high school teachers attended the summer seminar on teaching physics using Interactive Teaching Methods and Computers (ITMC) at Dickinson College between 1990 and 1996. College instructors have attended since the beginning, while high school teachers began attending in 1996. Of those in this targeted population, 35 could not be reached, or did not find it appropriate to respond for other reasons (e.g., several retired unexpectedly shortly after attending, others were graduate students who have continued their studies and have not yet entered the teaching field full-time). A total of 92 responses were received from the remaining target population of 200, for a response rate of 45%. A breakdown of respondents by year of attendance is provided in Chart 1, below.

Of the 92 respondents, 73 (79%) were male and 16 (17%) were female (see Chart 2). Overall, the group was quite experienced, having taught physics for an average of 19 years. The distribution of years of experience appeared to be bimodal. Over one-third of those responding fell in the "low experience" range of 3 to 12 years. This peak was followed by a drop-off in responses from those in their "mid-experience" years of 13 to 22 years (n=20). The second mode consisted of respondents who had a good deal of experience. Close to one-third of those responding had 23-32 years of experience. This peak was followed by a steep drop-off, as less than 10% of the respondent population had over 32 years of experience teaching (see Chart 3).

The majority of those who responded work in small departments: Nearly two-thirds (64%) taught in departments with faculty ranging from 1 to 5 (see Chart 4). Similarly, respondents tended to work at relatively small institutions. Fifty-nine respondents (57%) reported working in institutions of less than 3,000 students. The small institutional size is partly attributable to the inclusion of high school teachers in the sample (see Chart 5).

Fourteen respondents taught in high schools, while the plurality taught in colleges offering a bachelor’s as the highest degree (42%). A slight majority (51) taught in public institutions (55%; see Chart 6).

Of those teaching high school, nearly everyone, 15 of 16 respondents, reported using ITMC in "Regular Physics" courses, and half (8) reported using ITMC in teaching advanced physics. At the college level, a majority of respondents reported using ITMC methods in "Calculus-based" (57%) and "Algebra-Based" (51%) physics courses. At the same time, it appears that a wide variety of courses are being taught using ITMC at both the high school and the college levels (see Charts 7 and 8).

Those who teach physics using lectures (63) reported that the average class size was 56 students, the average class lasted 52 minutes, and the average course had 48 class sessions. The number of classes is inflated somewhat by including the high school respondents in the survey.

Those who teach labs (61) reported that the average lab had 22 students and lasted about 2 hours and 15 minutes. About 11 lab sessions per course were conducted, on average.

Those who reported teaching physics using the "workshop" approach (31) reported an average class size of 27 students. On average, classes last about 1 hour and 20 minutes, and courses consisted of about 35 class sessions. Once again, the number of class sessions per course is inflated somewhat by including the high school respondents in the survey.

In addition to lectures, labs, and workshop sessions, a catchall "alternative sessions" category was provided to capture activity that took place outside regularly scheduled lectures, labs, and workshop sessions. A number of respondents reported regularly using several types of alternative sessions, including group problem solving sessions (10), interactive tutorials (4), and recitations (7; see Chart 9). These sessions had an average of 18 students, lasted about an hour, and were conducted about 13 times during the teaching of the course.

Return to Table of Contents

Next Page