|
|
|
: Reports : Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annotations |
Report Excerpts |
|
|
Excerpt 1
[Teaching Introductory Combinatonics by Guided Group Discovery, Dartmouth College]
|
Project Features:
Describes project goals and objectives
|
In the proposal for this project, Professor A wrote that 'the primary goal of this project is to design teaching materials for a course in introductory combinatorics in which a large majority of the students learn of large majority of the material.' The project thus eschews the too-common practice of fixing the class pace to engage the better students, accepting that the less able or less prepared will emerge with shaky understandings and battered confidence. Guided discovery seeks to make learning more efficient for all students by matching the pace of instruction to the individual learner through a structured series of problems and by reducing isolation (and increasing available brain power) through group work. A grading system that rewards mastery before moving to the next level reinforces the message that genuine understanding is the goal. The evaluation of the Guided Discovery project thus has two goals: (1) to determine whether students learn combinatorics better and understand more deeply by guided discovery than through a standard lecture presentation and (2) to identify those pedagogical strategies that promote learning. |
|
|
Excerpt 2
[Collaborative Research: Developing and Implementing Just-in-Time-Tracking (JiTT) Techniques in the Principles of Economic Course, North Carolina A&T State University]
|
Project Features:
Describes project goals
|
Research and Education Activities:
This project focused on the adaptation and implementation of an innovative teaching technique originally developed for physics education Just-in-Time Teaching (JiTT) for use in introductory economics courses. Broadly speaking, JiTT techniques combine the use of out-of-class web-based exercises with active-learning pedagogy in a traditional classroom setting that makes students active participants in the learning process. By exploiting the communication and instructional efficiencies provided by the web and web-based course management tools and directly linking out-of-class student academic work with classroom-based learning, JiTT promotes increased student participation in the learning process, provides students and faculty with prompt feedback on student learning, and encourages better student preparation for class.
The multi-faceted approach of JiTT out-of-class web-based exercises followed by an interactive lecture, class discussion, or collaborative problem-solving exercises based on students' responses to the JiTT questions creates a positive learning cycle that actively engages students in the learning process and puts students at the center of that process. Our classroom experience bears out the benefits of using JiTT techniques: better student preparation for class, greater participation in classroom discussion, and useful feedback for instructors and students. An annotated timeline for the research and education activities carried out during the project is provided below: |
Describes project activities and duration
|
An annotated timeline for the research and education activities carried out during the project is provided below:
Spring, 2001 (Grant Awarded)
===========================
-National Science Foundation grant DUE-0088128 'Developing and Implementing Just-in-Time-Teaching (JiTT) Techniques in the Principles of Economics Course' awarded April 1, 2001
- Initial planning for implementation of JiTT pedagogy during fall, 2001
Summer, 2001 (Initial Development)
===========================
- Initial course planning for implementation of JiTT pedagogy in fall,
2001 courses
- Development of JiTT exercises for use in fall, 2001 courses
Fall, 2001 (Development and Implementation)
=======================================
- First implementation of JiTT in Principles of Macroeconomics and
Principles of Microeconomics. 180 students in three sections.
Creation of library of student JiTT responses and student comments
about use of JiTT
Spring, 2002 (Development and Implementation)
========================================
Second implementation of JiTT in Principles of Macroeconomics and
Principles of Microeconomics courses. 160 students in four sections.
Creation of library of student JiTT responses and student comments
about use of JiTT.
Summer, 2002 (Development and Implementation)
=====================================
- Formative assessment of implementation experience during fall, 2001
and spring, 2002 courses
- Development of formal assessment procedures and planning for
collection and analysis of student data (human subjects release,
questionnaire development, assessment design)
- Continuing development of JiTT exercises for use in fall, 2002
courses
Fall, 2002 (Assessment of Learning Outcomes)
==================================
Third implementation of JiTT
Working paper analyzing student learning outcomes developed
Initial JiTT presentations on student learning outcomes resulting from
classroom research
Spring, 2003 (Assessment/Dissemination)
=============================
Fourth implementation of JiTT in in Principles of Macroeconomics and
Principles of Microecnomics courses. 160 students in four sections.
Creation of library of student JiTT responses and student comments
about use of JiTT.
Working paper analyzing student learning outcomes developed
Continuing JiTT presentations on student learning outcomes resulting
from classroom research
Summer, 2003 (Assessment, Dissemination, Web Development)
=====================================
- Initial development of JiTTEcon web site
- Continuing analysis of student learning outcomes using updated data
Fall, 2003 (Assessment, Dissemination, Web Development)
==================================
Fifth implementation of JiTT in in Principles of Macroeconomics and
Principles of Microecnomics courses. 160 students in four sections.
Creation of library of student JiTT
responses and student comments about use of JiTT.
- Continuing development of JiTTEcon web site
- Continuing presentations on JiTT based on classroom research
As indicated in the timeline above, the project was divided into three
phases: (1) initial development and implementation (with formative
assessment), (2) implementation and formal assessment of student
learning outcomes, and (3) dissemination of results (via presentations
and development of JiTTEcon web site). |
|
|
Excerpt 3
[Interactive Computer and Web-Based Learning of Software Packages Used in Engineering, University of Texas Pan American]
|
Project Features:
Description of features of Education Technology-based project
|
Introduction
The principle objective for the grant was to introduce new pedagogical methods into the engineering curriculum that allow for the teaching and
integration of professional course related software. Interactive computer based training (CBT) or instruction was used to accomplish this
objective where the asynchronous delivery of interactive materials accommodated instruction that was outside of the typical classroom
environment and where access to the instructor was limited. The objective was accomplished in the four courses outlined in the proposal and to
a limited degree in two other mechanical engineering courses (Thermodynamics and Biomechanics). The software integrated with each course is listed as follows:
- Engineering Graphics Pro-Engineer
- Measurements and instrumentation LabView
- Mechanism Working Model and MathCAD
- Finite Elements Visual Nastran
Each software application requires a significant investment of time for the instructor to teach and for the student to learn and apply. This extra
burden on students was minimized through the effective use of CBT tools that can adapt to the student's instructional needs.
The introduction of CBT tools into the curriculum brought with it the ability to impact other aspects of the course and student learning. The
interactive games, quizzes, virtual world, and other resources offered on the instructional web sites developed for each class focused on course
fundamentals that are problematic for students. The additional assistance that students receive from these interactive tools can offset the cost of
introducing engineering software into the curriculum but more significantly provides needed feedback and variety in the instructional
environment.
|
|
|
|
|
|