home
  : Plans : Technology





























home reports instruments plans
search

Technology Annotated Plan Excerpts

Return to Technology Plans

Design

The table below contains plan excerpts (right column) accompanied by annotations (left column) identifying how the excerpts represent the Design Criteria.

Project Description | Evaluation Overview | Design | Analysis Process

Annotations Plan Excerpts
 

Excerpt 1 [North Dakota]

Data Collection Procedures & Schedule:
In table, ties evaluation questions to information sources and data collection procedures

The evaluation design matrix shown in Table 1 summarizes the formative and summative evaluation questions, sources and methods for gathering information, and the types of data that are needed. The evaluation questions are organized into four broad categories: educational context; project development and implementation; teacher outcomes; and student outcomes.

  • Educational Context - It is important to understand the perceived learner and teacher needs and the extant educational, cultural and technological context; this includes information about established standards, under-served schools, and access to technology. Baseline information will be collected through a review of existing local and regional documents.
  • Project Development and Implementation - As part of ongoing project management by the State Board for Vocational and Technical Education and CII, the nature of project activities involving TWT staff, partner organizations, and collaborating agencies will be documented. These self-reported activities may include technical assistance, training, support, program/resource development, dissemination, etc. The numbers of schools, students, educators, and community members participating in these learning activities will be tracked.
  • Educator and Student Outcomes - Both qualitative and quantitative approaches will be used to document project learning outcomes. Information from self-reports, on-site interviews and classroom observation, and review of sample lesson plans will allow us to document the changes in educational practices and their perceived benefits for various learners.

Although each evaluation question is unique, data collection activities are designed to address more than one question and several activities may address a single question. The matrix incorporates known sources of information and planned sources. The matrix also incorporates data that support the draft program performance indicators (listed in the appendix), although it is important to note that the evaluation questions do not directly correspond to the specific indicators that are referenced. These sources will be expanded and clarified as additional information becomes available regarding local goals and existing data collection activities.

 

Excerpt 2 [North Dakota]

Data Collection Procedures & Schedule:
Presents table that identifies what activities and instruments will be used to collect data, who will collect it, and when it will be collected

Data Collection Activities

The activities, primary responsibility, and schedule for evaluation data collection are summarized in Table 2. McREL's work will focus on evaluation design, synthesis of information, and reporting. Primary responsibility for collecting, entering and aggregating routine participant data will rest with the Center for Innovation in Instruction and the project regional coordinators. Other partners will be expected to respond to request for information in a timely and thoughtful manner.

As shown in the table, data collection instruments are expected to include the following:

  1. NCRTEC/Milken Profile Tool
  2. Participant Follow-up Survey
  3. Participant Evaluation Form (based on NCRTEC, CII or McREL customer survey)
  4. District/School Data Form (database)
  5. Training Activity Log (database)
  6. Participant Registration (database)
  7. Review Criteria
  8. Class/Video Observation Guide
  9. Site Interview Guide
  10. Organizational Interview Guide

Both on-line data collection, as part of project management databases, and paper-based data collection will be used. Data collection efforts will be integrated to minimize redundancies and demands on participants.