home
  : Plans : Curriculum Development





























home reports instruments plans
search

Curriculum Development Annotated Plan Excerpts

Return to Annotated Plan Excerpts: Design, Excerpt 2.

Table 7

Proposed Evaluation Strategy

Affective Outcomes Method of Evaluation Criteria
  • Attitudes toward mathematics
  • Math attitude survey (existing CRMSE instrument) of Calculus I students
  • Significant pre/post-test gains
  • Analysis by gender/race
  • Attitudes toward technology
  • Student course evaluations in all target courses (optically scanned response forms)
  • Positive rankings on 5-pt. Likert scale
  • Anecdotal reports from student, instructors, and computer lab GTA's
  • Analysis by gender/race
Intellectual Outcomes Method of Evaluation Criteria
  • Student ability to use computer algebra systems to solve calculus problems/complete projects
  • Individual and group project grades (sample group comparisons)
  • Correctness of solutions; progression of scores over 3-year project period
  • Increased conceptual understanding of calculus applications in other disciplines
  • Standardized assessment questions/problems to be added to each instructor's tests for all target courses; keyed to expected learning outcomes
  • Standardized lab projects for each course
  • Positive progression of scores over 3-year period as technology use is increased
  • Instructor ability to use computer algebra systems in teaching and curriculum development
  • Annual faculty/GTA survey
  • Student course evaluations
  • Positive rankings on 5-pt. Likert scale
  • Positive progression over 3-year period
Behavioral Outcomes Method of Evaluation Criteria
  • Drop/pass/fail rates
  • Longitudinal study of final grades for all target courses
  • Positive comparison with 1992-93 control group
  • Retention in math/science/engineering major
  • Success in future math courses
  • Longitudinal study of Calculus I students using SS# database
  • Positive comparison with 1992-93 control group
  • Gender/race analysis
  • Instructor use of technology in classroom
  • Annual faculty/GTA survey
  • Positive progression over 3-year period
  • Instructor participation in development/training activities
  • Workshop/seminar evaluations
  • Attendance records
  • Annual faculty/GTA survey
  • Progress toward goal of full participation