1. Is the observation instrument (the "log" and "topic" forms together) sufficiently focused for the purpose of the observers' visits?
2. How can this instrument be characterized on the lower-inference judgment vs. higher-inference judgment dimension?
3. How can this instrument be characterized on the event sampling vs. time sampling dimension?
4.
How can this instrument be characterized on the all-inclusive subjects vs. targeted subjects dimension?
5. How can this instrument be characterized on the real time vs. post hoc dimension?
6. How can this instrument be characterized on the quantitative vs. qualitative dimension?
7. Is there anything the consultants could add to this observation instrument to increase its usefulness as a feedback source on the effectiveness of the teachers' professional development and their pedagogical growth?