Teacher/Faculty Surveys
Instrument 19: Statistical Leaders
In the Palmetto State (SLIPS) Workshop Questionnaire
Project: Statistics Leaders in
the Palmetto State
Clemson University
Funding Source: NSF:
Teacher Enhancement (ESIE)
Purpose: The first instrument focuses
on teacher's understanding of statistical processes and procedures;
the second instrument focuses on teacher's ability to effectively
teach each of the processes and procedures.
Administered To: 85 teachers who participated
in the project's workshop. 35 of these were middle school
teachers; 50 were high school teachers.
Topics Covered:
- Self-Assessment (Teacher/Faculty): application
of instructional methods, confidence, content knowledge,
professional performance, understanding of instructional
methods
Format/Length: 26 closed-ended questions
total. Each instrument has 13 questions that use a 5-point
Likert scale.
Statistical
Leaders In the Palmetto State (SLIPS) Workshop
Part I
The purpose of this questionnaire is to collect information
on your understanding of the major purposes and procedures
in the Statistical Leaders In the Palmetto State Workshop.
A major objective of this workshop is concerned with your
comprehension of the major processes and procedures of statistics.
For this part of the questionnaire you are to indicate your
understanding of the processes/procedures on a five (5) point
scale. These (5) points are:
|
(5) I understand this process/procedure and can do it
well. |
|
(4) I understand this process/procedure
and can do it. |
|
(3) I know a little about this and can
do some of it. |
|
(2) I know a little about this, but cannot
do it. |
|
(1) I do not know about this process/procedure. |
The scale categories are listed across the top of the page
in five columns. The processes/procedures are listed from
the top to the bottom of the page.
For each process/procedure, put an "X" in the scale column
that reflects your understanding of the process/procedure
at this point of the workshop.
This information will be maintained confidentially and is
being collected to evaluate the workshop, not the workshop
participants.
Process/Procedure |
1. I do not know about this
process/ procedure. |
2. I know a little about this,
but cannot do it. |
3. I know a little about this
and can do some of it. |
4. I understand this process/
procedure and can do it. |
5. I understand this process/
procedure and can do it well. |
- Interpreting statistics presented in numerical/tabular
form
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Interpreting statistical data presented in graphical
or diagrammatic form
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Understanding the similarities, differences, and
relationships between and among the various numerical,
tabular, and graphical forms
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Comparing one data value to group(sample/population)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Comparing two groups(samples/populations) of data
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Detecting association between qualitative variables
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Detecting relationships between quantitative variables
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Detecting cause and effect from a well-designed
randomized comparative experiment
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Detecting trends and seasonality over time
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Interpret estimates and allow for variability of
estimates from sample to sample
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Comparison of sample frequencies with expected frequencies
from theoretical distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Describe the strength of the evidence against an
hypothesis by comparison of the observed value of
a test statistic with the assumed distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Apply rules for making a "yes-no" decision based
on a random sample, consider the two types of decision
error and consequences of each type of error
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teacher Education Instrument
19b
Teacher/Faculty Surveys
Statistical
Leaders In the Palmetto State (SLIPS) Workshop
Part II
The purpose of this questionnaire is to collect information
about the degree to which you feel you could effectively teach
your students about the majors processes and procedures in
the Statistical Leaders In the Paimetto State Workshop. For
this part of the questionnaire you are to indicate how you
feel about your ability to effectively teach each of the processes/procedures
on a five (5) point scale. These (5) points are:
|
(5) I am sure I could teach this effectively. |
|
(4) I may be able to teach this effectively. |
|
(3) I am not sure I could teach this effectively. |
|
(2) I may not be able to teach this effectively. |
|
(1) I am sure I could not teach this at
all. |
The scale categories are listed across the top of the page
in five columns. The processes/procedures are listed from
the top to the bottom of the page.
For each process/procedure, put an "X" in the scale column
that reflects your understanding of the process/procedure
at this point of the workshop.
This information will be maintained confidentially and is
being collected to evaluate the workshop, not the workshop
participants.
Process/Procedure |
1. I am sure I could not teach
this at all. |
2. I may not be able to teach
this effectively. |
3. I am not sure I could teach
this effectively. |
4. I may be able to teach
this effectively. |
5. I am sure I could teach
this effectively. |
- Interpreting statistics presented in numerical/tabular
form
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Interpreting statistical data presented in graphical
or diagrammatic form
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Understanding the similarities, differences, and
relationships between and among the various numerical,
tabular, and graphical forms
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Comparing one data value to group(sample/population)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Comparing two groups(samples/populations) of data
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Detecting association between qualitative variables
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Detecting relationships between quantitative variables
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Detecting cause and effect from a well-designed
randomized comparative experiment
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Detecting trends and seasonality over time
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Interpret estimates and allow for variability of
estimates from sample to sample
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Comparison of sample frequencies with expected frequencies
from theoretical distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Describe the strength of the evidence against an
hypothesis by comparison of the observed value of
a test statistic with the assumed distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Apply rules for making a "yes-no" decision based
on a random sample, consider the two types of decision
error and consequences of each type of error
|
|
|
|
|
|
|