Teacher/Faculty Surveys
Instrument 5: RMTEC Faculty Survey, Spring 1996
Project: Rocky Mountain Teacher Education Collaborative
(RMTEC)
University of Northern Colorado/Colorado State University, CSMATE
Funding Source: NSF: Collaboratives for Excellence
in Teacher Preparation (DUE)
Purpose: To determine how faculty have
added value to the course they revised
Administered To: All participating faculty
Topics Covered:
- Comparisons: methods, pedagogy
- Impact on Outcomes: student knowledge
- Impact Variables: instructional methods
- Implementation Activities: assessment, methods
use
- Lesson/Curriculum Plan: evaluation, methods
- Perceptions (Teacher/Faculty): mentoring/support
- Plans & Expectations (Teacher/Faculty): develop
methods
- Background Characteristics & Activities
(Teacher/Faculty): prior practice
Format/Length: 7
open-ended questions
RMTEC Faculty Survey
Spring 1996
Faculty member's name: ______________________________________________
1. What RMTEC course(s) have you taught?
2. What changes, if any have you made in instructional methods
that have differed from the traditional format in RMTEC course
you've taught?
3. What efforts have you made, if any, to determine if these
instructional methods have been successful?
4. What changes have you made in the way you used to think about
assessing students and in what ways, if any, have you changed
your methods of assessing students?
5. What evidence do you have that students are learning course
content in the RMTEC course(s) you've taught as well or better
than in traditionally taught classes?
6. How might you change your assessment techniques in RMTEC
courses in the future?
7. Would it be beneficial for you to have help in developing
alternative assessments?
|
 |
