Student Content Assessments
Instrument 2: PEERS Assessment Guide:
Ecosystems Content Knowledge
Project: People Exploring Ecosystem Resources as
Stewards (PEERS)
Eastern Oregon State College
Funding Source: NSF: Teacher Enhancement (ESIE)
Purpose: To determine significant changes in student
content knowledge of ecosystems management (issues, facts,
problems) via classroom concept-mapping evaluation
Administered To: Elementary and middle
school teachers who participated in PEERS summer institutes,
mini sessions, research projects, and evaluations and are
currently evaluating student content knowledge. These maps
and subsequent evaluations are conducted twice during the
unit.
Topics Covered:
- Content Specific Assessment: biology
Format/Length: 1
concept map. This instrument
contains four evaluative dimensions for use with student concept
maps for the purpose of evaluating student content knowledge:
vocabulary, concepts, actions/relationships, and interrelationships
relating to ecosystems management. Each dimension is assigned
point values: 1 point is given for each relevant vocabulary
term; 3 points for each concept identified; 3 points for each
identified action or relationship between terms or concepts;
and 5 points for examples of different interactions of ecosystems
management.
PEERS Assessment Guide:
Ecosystems Content Knowledge
Name: _________________________________________ Date:
____________________________
Goal: |
Significant change in knowledge
of ecosystems management, facts, issues, alternatives,
and problems. |
Instrument: |
Instructor evaluation of concept
maps. |
Administration: |
Concept maps or "webs" are created
on the first day of the second week as part of the field
experience. A second web is created on day 4 of week 2
as a comparison. |
Instructions: |
Students should start with the
ellipse at the center of the page and build a concept
map that depicts their personal knowledge and understanding
of ecosystems management. Point values are assigned as
follows. |
|
Vocabulary: 1 point for
each term that is salient to ecosystems management (branched
terms such as riparian, watershed, abiotic, biotic, organic,
photosynthesis, producer, consumer, management plan, consensus,
etc.) |
|
Concepts: 3 points for
each concept identified in relationship to ecosystems
management (separate ellipses for such ideas as baseline
data, monitoring, consensus building, stakeholders, intervention,
etc.). |
|
Actions/Relationships:
3 points for each connecting line that cites an action
or relationship between terms or concepts (arrows and
lines defined operatively such as, "is part of," "is restricted
by," "is maintained by," is governed by," "can be affected
by," etc.). |
|
Interrelationships: 5
points for cited examples of recursive, cyclic, or complex
interactions of ecosystem management. For example: economic
limitations and management decisions interactions (arrows
drawn and explained that show a high degree of exchange
between sets of concepts or ellipses). |
Student Prompt:
Please add additional ellipses for concepts, words, and
connecting lines that indicate descriptors, arrows to indicate
interactions and relationships, and operant words with arrows
to describe specific interactions. Please start with the ellipse
"Ecosystems Management" at the center of the sheet.
|
|