Student Course Evaluations                      
                  Instrument 17:  Moro Cojo Post-Assessment 
                  Project:  Teaching Scientific Inquiry Through Inter-disciplinary Problem-based Modules: Students as Partners in Ongoing Applied Research 
California State University Monterey Bay 
                  Funding Source: NSF - Undergraduate education (DUE) 
                  Purpose:  To assess affective learning related both to science and scientific writing 
                  Administered To:  Undergraduate biology and chemistry students 
                Topics Covered: 
                  
                                    
                    -  Content Specific Assessment: science inquiry, environmental science
 
                    -  Course Evaluation: practical value, content, activities, assignments, technology use, engagement, integration
 
                    -  Self Assessment (Student): content knowledge, understanding, skills, performance, participation
 
                    
                   
                  Format/Length: 21 closed-ended and 11 open-ended questions 
                 
                
				ESSP 240: Biology I, F'02 
				Moro Cojo Post-Assessment 
				 
				
  
  
    |  This course increased your ability to: | 
    agree strongly  | 
    agree  | 
    neutral  | 
    disagree  | 
    strongly disagree  | 
   
  
    | 1) | 
     Think of questions in biology | 
    5  | 
    4  | 
    3  | 
    2  | 
    1  | 
   
  
    | 2) | 
     Create testable hypotheses based on your questions | 
    5  | 
    4  | 
    3  | 
    2  | 
    1  | 
   
  
    | 3) | 
     Create an experiment that adequately tests your hypothesis | 
    5  | 
    4  | 
    3  | 
    2  | 
    1  | 
   
  
    | 4) | 
     Apply questions to broader scientific knowledge | 
    5  | 
    4  | 
    3  | 
    2  | 
    1  | 
   
  
    | 5) | 
     Analyze and interpret data | 
    5  | 
    4  | 
    3  | 
    2  | 
    1  | 
   
  
    | 6) | 
     Write about an experiment in the scientific style | 
    5  | 
    4  | 
    3  | 
    2  | 
    1  | 
   
  
    | 7) | 
     Use published literature in your scientific writing | 
    5  | 
    4  | 
    3  | 
    2  | 
    1  | 
   
  
    | 8) | 
     Understand the components of a scientific paper (e.g., Introduction, Results, etc.) | 
    5  | 
    4  | 
    3  | 
    2  | 
    1  | 
   
  
    | 9) | 
     Ability to create a context for your scientific study using literature | 
    5  | 
    4  | 
    3  | 
    2  | 
    1  | 
   
 
 
 
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    | 1) | 
    Reflect on an experience of conducting an experiment in 
	this class. Describe that experience briefly. What did you learn 
	about the process of doing science from that experiment? What have you 
	learned about the process of science from this class overall? (Name the 
	experiment in your answer.)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
    1b. | 
    What do you think is the most difficult 
	aspect of doing science?  Describe any part of the scientific 
	process that you find difficult and explain why.  Has this 
	changed as a result of this class? 
	
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
     
  
    | 2) | 
    What have you learned from working on these applied, 
	restoration projects?  Has this been a valuable learning experience?  
	Will you be able to apply these experiences to other classes, career plans, 
	or other life experiences?  Give specific examples from the Fort Ord Dunes 
	and/or Moro Cojo Slough projects if possible. 
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
     
  
    | 3) | 
    Was the Web site helpful for your Moro Cojo project?
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
      | 
    Very much | 
    Somewhat | 
    Not at all | 
    Didn't access it | 
   
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    | 4) | 
    For those who used the Web site, any suggestions for improvement? 
      
 
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    | 5) | 
    Did you incorporate what you learned in Chemistry 
	II from Dr. Swarup Wood or Dr. Liese Schultz in your biology project?
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
      | 
    Yes | 
    No | 
    Didn't take at CSUMB | 
      | 
   
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    | 6) | 
    If you incorporated your Chemistry II knowledge 
	and/or project into your biology project, did this integration 
	enhance your learning experience?
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
      | 
    Very much | 
    Somewhat | 
    Not at all  | 
    Not applicable  | 
   
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    | 7) | 
    The fact that the projects were centered 
	around a degraded, locally important, habitat increased my interest...
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
      | 
    Very much | 
    Some | 
    Very little  | 
      | 
   
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    | 8) | 
    The fact that I got to 
	design my own project increased my interest in the Moro Cojo project...
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
      | 
    Very much | 
    Some | 
    Very little  | 
      | 
   
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    | 9) | 
    The data I produced may someday be used by others 
	to evaluate wetland restoration projects in the area. This increased 
	my interest in the project...
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
      | 
    Very much | 
    Some | 
    Very little  | 
      | 
   
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    | 10) | 
    As learning experiences, the Moro Cojo Projects were:
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
      | 
    Excellent | 
    Good | 
    Poor | 
      | 
   
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    | 11) | 
    Did the Moro Cojo project increase my understanding of how science works?
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
      | 
    Very much | 
    Some | 
    Very little  | 
      | 
   
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    | 12) | 
    The Moro Cojo projects were:
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
      | 
    Very interesting | 
    Fairly interesting | 
    Not very interesting | 
      | 
   
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    | 13) | 
    The Moro Cojo project was relevant to my personal interests...
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
      | 
    Very much | 
    Some | 
    Very little  | 
      | 
   
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    | 14) | 
    Has the learning you've gained from Moro 
	Cojo Slough applied to other aspects of your life?
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
      | 
    Yes | 
    No | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    | 15) | 
    Have the projects increased the value of science in your life?
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
      | 
    Very much  | 
    Somewhat | 
    Not at all  | 
      | 
   
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    Please explain any of your answers above or give 
	any other feedback on the quality of the Moro Cojo projects as learning 
	experiences. (Use back of sheet if needed.) 
	
 
 
 
 
  | 
     
  
    |   | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
      | 
   
  
    | 16) | 
    Write a reflective piece on what you learned 
	from your work at Moro Cojo Slough. Please include the educational 
	value (if any) of working on an applied project and the specific 
	scientific knowledge and skills you gained (if any). (Examples of 
	questions you could address: What do you know now about this area 
	that you didn't know before you went out there? What did you see 
	that you didn't expect to see (smell, hear, think, etc)?). Please write 
	on the back of this sheet if needed. 
	
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
     
 
 
 
 
  
				
				
				
				
				
				
                
               | 
                |