Student Course Evaluations
Instrument 9: Student Evaluations of Teaching
Effectiveness Surveys (Close-ended SETs)
Project: Computer-Mediated
Social Science Instructional Modules
San Francisco State University
Funding Source: NSF - Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE)
Purpose: To obtain student feedback on classes that incorporated treatment modules
Administered To: College students
Topics Covered:
- Course Evaluation: organization, effectiveness, instructor, endorsement
Format/Length: 14 closed-ended scaled items
Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness Surveys
(Close-ended SETs)
|
|
Strongly
Agree
|
Agree
|
Neither
|
Disagree
|
Strongly
Disagree
|
|
|
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
*1.
|
The class was well organized. |
|
*2.
|
The syllabus stated course objectives,
requirements and grading policies clearly. |
|
*3.
|
The instructor effectively used assignments
to enhance learning. |
|
4.
|
The instructor provided helpful feedback
on my performance. |
|
5.
|
The instructor has command of the subject. |
|
*6.
|
The instructor showed a strong interest
in the matter. |
|
*7.
|
The instructor is able to express ideas
clearly. |
|
8.
|
The instructor showed respect for students
with different points of view. |
|
9.
|
The instructor welcomed questions. |
|
*10.
|
The instructor encouraged critical thinking
about course topics and material. |
|
*11.
|
The instructor motivated me to learn more
about the subject. |
|
*12.
|
The course contributed significantly to
my knowledge of the subject. |
|
*13.
|
Overall, the course was taught effectively. |
|
14.
|
Overall, I would recommend this instructor
to other students. |
*Nine dimensions of teaching effectiveness used in this analysis.
|
