home
  : Instruments : Curriculum Development





























home reports instruments plans
search

Curriculum Development Instruments

Return to Instrument Table

Teacher/Faculty Surveys

Instrument 3: Mathematics Across the Curriculum Faculty Survey

Project: Anonymous 3

Funding Source: NSF: Course and Curriculum Development (DUE)

Purpose: To gather information on faculty perspectives about teaching quantitative reasoning and skills

Administered To: Participating mathematics faculty

Topics Covered:

  • Attitudes & Beliefs (Teacher/Faculty): approach
  • Institutional Context: career advancement, faculty incentives
  • Instructional Practices: classroom activities, collaborative activities, instructional approach, technology
  • Perceptions (Teacher/Faculty): mentoring/support, methods, role, student characteristics, student engagement, student understanding
  • Project Development/Continuation: approach, collaboration, method, participation
  • Background Characteristics & Activities (Teacher/Faculty): current practice, experience, project involvement
  • Demographics (Teacher/Faculty): age

Format/Length: 25 questions, 24 closed-ended 4-point Likert scale ("strongly agree" to "disagree"), 1 open-ended, and 9 additional demographic questions


Mathematics Across the Curriculum Faculty Survey

This survey is part of a nationwide effort to assay faculty perspectives about teaching quantitative reasoning and skills. It is supported by the National Science Foundation. All faculty in disciplines that employ quantitative methods are invited to complete the survey. Please take a few minutes to answer honestly and thoughtfully. Your responses are very important to the research and will be treated with great respect and confidentiality.

Please complete with a #2 pencil:

 
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
  1. Most students come to my courses with quantitative skills they need.
1
2
3
4
  1. Using technology in the classroom confuses students more than it helps them.
1
2
3
4
  1. I use technology (e.g., WWW, graphing calculators, computers) to teach quantitative material.
1
2
3
4
  1. My institution makes it easy for me to use technology in my teaching.
1
2
3
4
  1. The average student in my classes will be able to apply quantitative skills effectively after graduation.
1
2
3
4
  1. Lecture is usually the most effective way to present quantitative subject matter.
1
2
3
4
  1. I use group activities in my teaching.
1
2
3
4
  1. Colleagues in my department support efforts to develop innovative instructional methods.
1
2
3
4
  1. We need to improve the way quantitative skills are taught at this institution.
1
2
3
4
  1. My job as insructor is to create a situation where students can discover important concepts for themselves.
1
2
3
4
  1. My institution provides faculty with resources for developing innovative instruction.
1
2
3
4
  1. Most students completing my course really understand the key ideas.
1
2
3
4
  1. Group activities help students learn mathematics.
1
2
3
4
  1. In the last three years, I have taught collaboratively with an instructor outside my discipline.
1
2
3
4
  1. At my institution, ineffective teaching is no bar to professional advancement.
1
2
3
4
  1. I am often frustrated with my lack of effectiveness in reaching students.
1
2
3
4
  1. Students grasp mathematical concepts most easily when they are introduced in the context of an application.
1
2
3
4
  1. My institution rewards innovative teaching methods and curriculum development.
1
2
3
4
  1. We need to increase our use of technology in teaching quantitative skills.
1
2
3
4
  1. With my average student, it is best to focus on teaching algorithms rather than concepts.
1
2
3
4
  1. I use complex real-life applications to teach quantitative material.
1
2
3
4
  1. In my department, we need more discussion of pedagogical issues.
1
2
3
4
  1. During the last term, I discussed innovative teaching strategies with my colleagues.
1
2
3
4
  1. We need to improve how quantitative skills are assessed at this institution.
1
2
3
4

Demographic Information

  1. Please indicate your department (Mark all that apply):

Humanities
Sciences
Social Science
Art/Art History Biology Anthropology
Classics Chemistry African/African American Studies
Comparative Literature Computer Sciences Asian Studies
Drama Earth Sciences Economics
English Engineering Education
Film Studies Environmental Studies Geography
Foreign Language Mathematics Government
Music Mathematics and the Social Sciences History
Philosophy Physics and Astronomy Latin American & Caribbean Studies
Religion   Linguistics & Cognitive Science
    Psychology
    Sociology
    Women's Studies

  1. Please fill in today's date:

    MM - DD - YR -
    ____ ____ ____

  2. How many years have you been teaching?  _______

  3. How many years haveyou been at College?  _______

  4. How old are you?  _______

  5. Please indicate your rank:

    Lecturer

    Assistant Professor

    Associate Professor

    Professor

    Adjunct Faculty (all ranks)

    Visiting Faculty (all ranks)

  6. Please indicate your level of involvement with the Mathematics Across the Currciulum project:

    Principal Investigator

    Participating Faculty

    Nonparticipating Faculty

  7. Please fill in the last six digits of your Social Security Number. This enables us to match surveys from the beginning and end of the study. It does not enable us to identify you.  _ _ _ _ _ _

  8. OPTIONAL: If you would like, please write your name here:  ________________________

  9. We are interested in the teaching and learning of quantitative reasoning and skills at the college level. If you have comments about how mathematics is taught or used in your field, in your department, or in the College at large, or about student abilities or attitudes, we invite you to offer them in the space below. Thank you.