home
  : Plans : Alignment Table





























home reports instruments plans
search

Alignment Table for Plan Components

Project Description

The alignment table for sound project evaluation plans can be viewed either as a whole, displaying all components, or as four separate tables corresponding to plan components: (1) Project Description, (2) Evaluation Overview, (3) Design, and (4) Analysis Process. See the alignment table overview for a general description of what appears in the alignment tables.

The glossary and quality criteria entries for plan components are also available on their own.

Component Glossary Entry Quality Criteria Related Program Evaluation Standards
Project Description

Describes the project that will be evaluated so that the reader of the report will understand the scope of the evaluation and be able to understand the association between the project's components and its intended outcomes (e.g., impacts and payoff).

Note: The evaluation plan need not describe the project if the plan is embedded in the project proposal.

   
Project Features

Describes the project's features (e.g., philosophy, rationale, goals, objectives, strategies, activities, procedures, location, duration, resources).

The following features of the targeted project should be overviewed:

  • project goals (both explicit and implicit) and objectives
  • principal project activities designed to achieve the goals
  • expected short-term and long-term outcomes

If available, additional overview information should be provided about:

  • project location and implementation sites
  • project duration
  • resources used to implement the project

If more than one site is implementing a project, the plan should, if possible, describe the sites and the anticipated variation that may be expected across them.

A1 Program Documentation
The program being evaluated should be described and documented clearly and accurately, so that the program is clearly identified.

Project Participants, Audiences, & Other Stakeholders

Identifies individuals or groups participating in, or otherwise affected by or invested in the project.

The different stakeholder groups should be identified and their relationships to the project summarized, as well as whatever is already known about their perspectives that has impacted decision-making on the evaluation design being proposed in the plan.

U1 Stakeholder Identification
Persons involved in or affected by the evaluation should be identified, so that their needs can be addressed.

Project Context

Identifies external influences on the project that will impact the proposed evaluation design (e.g., the timing of the project relative to other factors or events; organizational/institutional, historical, economic, political, and social conditions; demographic characteristics of project participants).

An understanding of contextual factors is necessary if an evaluation is to be realistic and responsive to the conditions within which the project operates.

A2 Context Analysis
The context in which the project exists should be examined in enough detail, so that its likely influences on the project can be identified.

Not sure where to start?  
Try reading some user scenarios for plans.