Teacher/Faculty Workshop Evaluations
Instrument 1: Leadership Modeling Workshop
Evaluation Survey
Project: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in
the Preparation of Teachers (ACEPT)
Arizona State University
Funding Source: NSF: Collaboratives for Excellence
in Teacher Preparation (DUE)
Purpose: To assess participant's reaction
to a summer workshop
Administered To: Participating teachers
Topics Covered:
- Impact on Outcomes: teacher attitudes
- Impact Variables: content, professional
development activities
- Plans & Expectations (Teacher/Faculty):
project implementation
- Self-Assessment (Teacher/Faculty): content
knowledge
- Workshop Evaluation: collaboration, satisfaction,
technology use
Format/Length: 1 open- and 10 closed-ended
questions total. Closed-ended questions use Likert scales
and have space for comments.
1996 Workshop Evaluation Survey
This survey is intended to assist the staff of the Modeling
Instruction project in the evaluation of this summer's
workshop as required by the National Science Foundation.
Please answer all questions based on your experience during
the current workshop.
If there are issues related to a given question that you
would like to comment on, please write your comments in the
provided space, and continue on the back of the respective
page if necessary.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Name: ___________________________________________________________
|
1.
|
To what extent were you able to articulate the model
structure in the materials developed by your group?
Comments:
|
1
Very well
|
2
Well
|
3
Fair
|
4
Poor
|
5
Uncertain
|
|
2.
|
To what extent were you able to articulate the model
structure in the materials developed by other groups?
Comments:
|
1
Very well
|
2
Well
|
3
Fair
|
4
Poor
|
5
Uncertain
|
|
3.
|
How good was the idea of letting participants develop
materials in separate groups?
Comments:
|
1
Very well
|
2
Well
|
3
Fair
|
4
Poor
|
5
Uncertain
|
|
4.
|
To what extent were you able to benefit from review
of available software?
Comments:
|
1
Very well
|
2
Well
|
3
Fair
|
4
Poor
|
5
Uncertain
|
|
5.
|
To what extent were you able to benefit from the CASTLE
training?
Comments:
|
1
Very well
|
2
Well
|
3
Fair
|
4
Poor
|
5
Uncertain
|
|
6.
|
To what extent were you able to benefit from the Visual
Quantum Mechanics presentation?
Comments:
|
1
Very well
|
2
Well
|
3
Fair
|
4
Poor
|
5
Uncertain
|
|
7.
|
To what extent were you able to benefit from the INFO-MALL
training?
Comments:
|
1
Very well
|
2
Well
|
3
Fair
|
4
Poor
|
5
Uncertain
|
|
8.
|
To what extent were you able to benefit from Prof.
Hestenes' talks?
Comments:
|
1
Very well
|
2
Well
|
3
Fair
|
4
Poor
|
5
Uncertain
|
|
9.
|
To what extent were your original expectations about
the current workshop fulfilled?
Comments:
|
1
Very well
|
2
Well
|
3
Fair
|
4
Poor
|
5
Uncertain
|
|
10.
|
What is the likelihood of your using the following
materials next academic year?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) CASTLE (modified)
|
1
Very
Likely
|
2
Likely
|
3
Somewhat Likely
|
4
Unlikely
|
5
Uncertain
|
|
|
(b) The microscopic approach in electricity
|
1
Very
Likely
|
2
Likely
|
3
Somewhat Likely
|
4
Unlikely
|
5
Uncertain
|
|
|
(c) Magnetism
|
1
Very
Likely
|
2
Likely
|
3
Somewhat Likely
|
4
Unlikely
|
5
Uncertain
|
|
|
(d) The universal approach in energy
|
1
Very
Likely
|
2
Likely
|
3
Somewhat Likely
|
4
Unlikely
|
5
Uncertain
|
|
|
(e) CBL / TI-82, 83
|
1
Very
Likely
|
2
Likely
|
3
Somewhat Likely
|
4
Unlikely
|
5
Uncertain
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
What changes, if any, has the workshop convinced you
are necessary to bring about in your teaching practice,
and which of these changes will you implement this coming
year?
|
|
|
General comments & recommendations?
|
|
