Teacher/Faculty Workshop Evaluations
Instrument 2: Program Evaluation
Project: Assembly and Packaging of Microelectronic
Devices
College of Engineering, San Jose State University
Funding Source: NSF: Undergraduate Faculty Enhancement (DUE)
Purpose: To evaluate the workshop and use the results
for future program planning
Administered To: Faculty members who teach engineering
to undergraduates
Topics Covered:
- Facilities: accommodations, administrative support,
classroom, laboratory
- Plans & Expectations (Teacher/Faculty): project
implementation
- Project Development/Continuation: activities,
arrangements, content, facilities, methods
- Workshop Evaluation: activities, areas for program
improvement, content, exemplary areas, integration,
methods, opportunity to practice, organization, practical
value, rigor, satisfaction
- Background Characteristics & Activities
(Teacher/Faculty): professional development
activities
Format/Length: 37 questions total, 30 closed-ended
Likert scale and 7 open-ended
______________________________________________________________________________________
Assembly and Packaging of Microelectronic
Devices
July 6-11 and July 20-25, 1997
______________________________________________________________________________________
PROGRAM EVALUATION
Please help us with future program planning by completing
this evaluation form.
| Part I.
Program Development and Organization |
No
Opin. |
Excel-
lent |
Very
Good |
Aver-
age |
Fair |
Poor |
| Program schedule, pace, timing |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Course syllabus overall |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Use of audio-visual to support program |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Classroom facilities |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Laboratory facilities |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Administrative support service |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Part II.
Program Objectives - How good a job did the program do
in meeting the following objectives? |
No
Opin. |
Excel-
lent |
Very
Good |
Aver-
age |
Fair |
Poor |
| Introduced you to recent technological developments |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Introduced you to recent professional practice |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Provided you with hands-on laboratory experience |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Taught you what the major issues in MEP
design are |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Taught you what unit operations are involved
in the manufacturing operations |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Taught you what factors affect the long
term reliability of the packages |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall, your opinion of the Program |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Part III
- Allocation of Time - Please note the new column heading
at the right. Indicate the extent of your agreement
or disagreement with each of the following statements: |
|
Strongly
Agree |
Agree |
Disagree |
Strongly
Disagree |
No
Opinion |
| The amount of time spent in lectures was
more than I thought it would be. |
|
5 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
| The amount of time spent in lectures was
appropriate. |
|
5 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
| The amount of time spent in laboratories
was more than I thought it would be. |
|
5 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
| The amount of time spent in laboratories
was appropriate. |
|
5 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
| I believe that I will be able to integrate
material from this Program into my existing curricula. |
|
5 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
| The tour was a valuable part of the Program. |
|
5 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
| The lectures tied logically to the lab exercises. |
|
5 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
| Lectures did not seem to fully explain principles
that were explored in the labs. |
|
5 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
| Overall, I think this Program will enable
me to introduce MEP material into my curriculum. |
|
5 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Part IV. Comparisons - How many 3 - 5 day workshops
have you attended in your career-
|
No.
of workshops: |
|
|
enter estimated number at right:--->
|
|
| Please rate
this short course in comparison with others that you have
attended. Place check mark in appropriate
box. |
Best of all |
Among the Best 15% |
About average |
Among the Worst 15% |
Worst of all |
|
Suitability of facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arrangements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concern for student experience
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality of instruction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level of instruction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syllabus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practical value
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV. Program Improvement
What are some ways that this program can be improved for
the next group?
A: Instruction materials
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
B: Course contents
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
C: Laboratory exercises
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
D: Scheduling
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
E: Field trips
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
F: Facilities
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
|
