home
  : Instruments : Curriculum Development





























home reports instruments plans
search

Curriculum Development Instruments

Return to Instrument Table

Teacher/Faculty Surveys

Instrument 19: Survey of Instructional Content for English Language Arts and Reading

Project: Surveys of Enacted Curriculum
Council of Chief State School Officers

Funding Source: NSF: EHR

Purpose: To gather objective information about the English language arts and reading content that is taught across a wide variety for grade levels and programs

Administered To: K-12 teachers whose school districts are participating in Surveys of Enacted Curriculum project

Topics Covered:

  • Implementation Activities: content, method, activities, curriculum/materials, equipment/technology, collaboration, professional development activities
  • Learning Environment/Classroom: method, pedagogy
  • Lesson/Curriculum Plan: learning environment, methods, content, activities
  • Self Assessment (Teacher): application of instructional methods, implementation activities, preparation

Format/Length: 605 closed-ended items


Section II

 


Survey of Instructional Content
for
English Language Arts and Reading


We now ask for the topics you teach and the expectations you have for student learning in the target reading or language arts class. The next few pages list numerous topics associated with English language arts and reading instruction. The lists were developed to gather objective information about the content that is taught across a wide variety of grade levels and programs. The lists comprehend nearly all topics that experience and research suggest have a place in reading, English language arts, and literature instruction in U.S. classrooms. However, they do not represent recommended or prescribed content and may or may not be reflective of your local curriculum.

Please read the instructions on the next two pages carefully before proceeding.

 

 

STEP 1: Indicate topics not covered in this class.

Begin by reviewing the entire list of topics identified in the topics column of each table, noting how topics are grouped. After reviewing each topic within a given grouping, if none of the topics listed within that group receive any instructional coverage, circle the "<none>" in the "Time on Topic" column for that group. For any individual topic which is not covered in this reading/language arts class, fill-in the circled "zero" in the "Time on Topic" column. (Not necessary for those groups with "<none>" circled.) Any topics or topic groups so identified will not require further response. [Note, for example, that the class described in the example below did not cover any topics under "Fluency" and so "<none>" is circled.]

STEP 2: Indicate amount of time spent on each topic covered in this class.

Examine the list of topics a second time. This time note the amount of coverage devoted to each topic by filling in the appropriately numbered circle in the "Time on Topic" column, based upon the following codes:

  0 = None, not covered
  1 = Slight coverage (less than 1 class/lesson)
  2 = Moderate coverage (1 to 5 classes/lessons)
  3 = Sustained coverage (more than 5 classes/lessons)



STEP 3: Indicate relative emphases of each student expectation for every topic taught.

The final step in completing this section of the survey concerns your expectations for what students should know and be able to do. For each topic area, please provide information about the relative amount of instructional time spent on work designed to help students reach each of the listed expectations by filling in the appropriately numbered circle using the response codes listed below. (Note: To the left of each content sheet, you will find a list of descriptors for each of the five expectations for students.)

  0 = No emphasis (Not an expectation for this topic)
  1 = Slight emphasis (Accounts for less than 25% of the time spent on this topic)
  2 = Moderate emphasis (Accounts for 25% to 33% of the time spent on this topic)
  3 = Sustained emphasis (Accounts for more than 33% of the time spent on this topic)
     
Note:
A code of "3" should typically be given for only one, and no more than two expectation categories within any given topic. No expectation codes should be filled-in for those topics for which no coverage is provided (i.e., circled "0" or "<none>").





Expectations for Students in English Language Arts and Reading

       
Recall

Evaluate

  Provide facts, terms, definitions, conventions

Describe

Locate literal answers in a text

Identify relevant information

Reproduce sounds or words

  Determine relevance, coherence, internal consistency, logic

Test conclusions, hypotheses

Critique

Assess adequacy, appropriateness, credibility

Demonstrate/Explain

Generate/Create

  Follow instructions

Give examples

Summarize

Identify purpose, main ideas, organizational patterns

Check consistency

Recognize relationships

  Integrate

Dramatize

Express ideas through writing, speaking, drawing

Create/develop connections with text, self, world

Synthesize content and ideas from several sources

Integrate with other topics and subjects

Develop reasonable alternatives

Predict probable consequences
Analyze/Investigate

   
  Categorize, schematize

Distinguish fact and opinion

Make inferences, draw conclusions

Generalize

Order, group, outline, organize ideas

Gather information

Compare and contrast

Identify with another's point of view

   
       

Response Codes
Time on Topic


Response Codes
Expectations for Students

 
0 =
None
(Not covered)
 
0 =
No emphasis
(Not a performance goal for this topic)
 
1 =
Slight coverage
(Less than 1 class/lesson)
 
1 =
Slight emphasis
(Less than 25% of time on this topic)
 
2 =
Moderate coverage
(1 - 5 classes/lessons)
 
2 =
Moderate emphasis
(25% to 33% of time on this topic)
 
3 =
Sustained coverage
(More than 5 classes/lessons)
 
3 =
Sustained emphasis
(More than 33% of time on this topic)